[PATCH 04/18] ARM: at91: make ST (System Timer) soc independent

On 07:33 Mon 20 Feb     , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:02:34AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

quoted

On 12:52 Mon 20 Feb     , Ryan Mallon wrote:

quoted

That isn't an excuse to leave incorrect code there. It is a simple fix.

no (void) in c means you don't care of the return so basically it's right

Let's be clear: it's legal, but redundant and unnecessary.

So as I said it's no the focus of this patch

I don't want to do it at the same time

Best Regards,
J.