[PATCH 04/18] ARM: at91: make ST (System Timer) soc independent
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-20 03:30:56
Also in:
lkml
On 14:16 Mon 20 Feb , Ryan Mallon wrote:
On 20/02/12 14:02, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:quoted
On 12:52 Mon 20 Feb , Ryan Mallon wrote:quoted
On 20/02/12 12:38, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:quoted
On 11:22 Mon 20 Feb , Ryan Mallon wrote:quoted
On 18/02/12 04:49, Nicolas Ferre wrote:quoted
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <redacted> --- arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c | 4 +- arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++---------- arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 1 + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_st.h | 32 +++++++++++++++------- arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91rm9200.h | 2 +- drivers/watchdog/at91rm9200_wdt.c | 8 +++--- 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.cHi Jean, Nicolas, Patch looks mostly good, couple of points below. ~Ryan <snip>quoted
/* Cancel any pending alarm; flush any pending IRQ */ - at91_sys_write(AT91_ST_RTAR, alm); - (void) at91_sys_read(AT91_ST_SR); + at91_st_write(AT91_ST_RTAR, alm); + (void) at91_st_read(AT91_ST_SR);Can we please remove the (void) casting of the return value when making this change, especially since at91_st_read is now a macro which doesn't even have a return value. Same in a few other places.modification done by script and it's no the scope of this patchThat isn't an excuse to leave incorrect code there. It is a simple fix.no (void) in c means you don't care of the return so basically it's rightBecause of the way the __raw_writel is defined you are casting the result of an assignment, basically you are doing this: int foo, bar; (void)(foo = bar); Which is pointless. Don't make excuses for silly, redundant code. Fix it, please.
except it's a read it has nothing to do with that Best Regards, J.