-----Original Message-----
From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij at linaro.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:01 AM
To: Sascha Hauer
Cc: Dong Aisheng-B29396; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org; linus.walleij at stericsson.com; Guo Shawn-
R65073; kernel at pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Sascha Hauer [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
I don't think that this grouping of pads to their functions makes
sense. On i.MX every pad is muxed independently and not in groups.
Which pins belong to which function is board specific and not SoC
specific.
True, Dong can this be moved to the imx pinctrl platform data and passed
in from arch/arm/[plat|mach]-* board files instead?
That is probably where it belongs today.
Yes, I will do that.
I know that this data is in drivers/pinctrl for the U300 and SIRF, but
that is because they only have one single board variant.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Regards
Dong Aisheng