[PATCH 2/6] ARM: add Highbank core platform support
From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-20 18:44:49
Arnd, On 08/18/2011 10:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 16 August 2011, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
+void __iomem *a9_base_addr = ((void __iomem *)(HB_MPIC_VIRT_BASE)); +void __iomem *sregs_base; + +static struct map_desc highbank_io_desc[] __initdata = { + { + .virtual = HB_MPIC_VIRT_BASE, + .pfn = 0, /* run-time */ + .length = SZ_4K, + .type = MT_DEVICE, + }, +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LL + { + .virtual = HB_DEBUG_LL_VIRT_BASE, + .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(HB_DEBUG_LL_PHYS_BASE), + .length = SZ_4K, + .type = MT_DEVICE, + }, +#endif +}; + +static void __init highbank_map_io(void) +{ + unsigned long base; + + /* Get SCU base */ + asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (base)); + + highbank_io_desc[0].pfn = __phys_to_pfn(base); + iotable_init(highbank_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(highbank_io_desc)); +}I really liked the way that Barry moved the io_desc out to the drivers using them, e.g arch/arm/mach-prima2/lluart.c. Can you do the same thing with your lluart and with the a9_base_addr? I guess it can live locally in platsmp.c.
Okay.
quoted
+void highbank_init_irq(void) +{ + struct device_node *node; + struct of_intc_desc desc; + int n = 0; + + memset(&desc, 0, sizeof(desc)); + desc.controller = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-gic"); + gic_of_init(&desc); + node = desc.controller; + for_each_child_of_node(node, desc.controller) { + gic_of_ppi_init(&desc); + } + + for_each_compatible_node(node, NULL, "arm,pl061") { + irq_domain_add_simple(node, 160 + (8 * n)); + n++; + }Where does the "160 + (8 * n)" come from? Is that something that should be in a property of the gic binding?
All this should go away once we have dynamic linux irq number assignment. Actually, I should just delete this for now as the pl061 driver doesn't support interrupts yet with DT binding (without platform data).
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0 + l2x0_of_init(0, ~0UL); +#endif +}Hmm, I missed that during the review of the patch that adds l2x0_of_init, but I think the #ifdef should really be in the header file, not in the user, so that calling l2x0_of_init when CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0 is not set automatically turns into an empty stub.
It's also a problem with l2x0_init. I'll add a patch to do that.
quoted
+static void __init highbank_timer_init(void) +{ + int irq; + struct device_node *np; + void __iomem *timer_base; + + /* Map system registers */ + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "calxeda,hb-sregs"); + sregs_base = of_iomap(np, 0); + + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,sp804"); + timer_base = of_iomap(np, 0); + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0); + + highbank_clocks_init(); + + sp804_clocksource_init(timer_base + 0x20, "timer1"); + sp804_clockevents_init(timer_base, irq, "timer0"); +}How about moving the sp804 initialization from device tree into the arch/arm/common/timer-sp.c file? Why do you initialize sregs_base from timer_init?
It will be needed before the clocks are initialized. The clock code is not using it at the moment as I just did a minimal fixed clock implementation until the clock api and DT clock bindings gets sorted out. As there are multiple users, I didn't put it in highbank_clocks_init.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-highbank/include/mach/timex.h b/arch/arm/mach-highbank/include/mach/timex.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..88dac7a --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/mach-highbank/include/mach/timex.h@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +#ifndef __MACH_TIMEX_H +#define __MACH_TIMEX_H + +#define CLOCK_TICK_RATE 1000000 + +#endifIn 3.2, we shouldn't need this any more. We'll have to come up with a way to remember removing the new definitions that come in in parallel to the patch that removes the old ones.
I'm tracking the various clean-ups and we can coordinate the order things go in. I've already made gpio.h empty for example, so gpio will fail to compile if enabled in this series. Or I can just submit a patch deleting this file later. It will just be dead code and won't conflict.
quoted
+#ifndef _MACH_HIGHBANK__SYSREGS_H_ +#define _MACH_HIGHBANK__SYSREGS_H_ + +extern void __iomem *sregs_base; + +#define HB_SREG_A9_PWR_REQ 0xf00 +#define HB_SREG_A9_BOOT_STAT 0xf04 +#define HB_SREG_A9_BOOT_DATA 0xf08 + +#define HB_PWR_SUSPEND 0 +#define HB_PWR_SOFT_RESET 1 +#define HB_PWR_HARD_RESET 2 +#define HB_PWR_SHUTDOWN 3 + +#endifDo these really need to be global? I think it's better to put the base address and register definitions into a single file and export functions to be used from elsewhere.
Yes, sregs are a random collection of functions, so it's going to be a mixture of various users. Just HB_PWR_* alone are in 2 or 3 different places. Rob