On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:35 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:52:22AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
Excellent! I've split the patch up into four distinct parts, as per your
suggestions. I've submitted these to your patch system (6670/1-6673/1)
alongside a fixed version of the printf format patch (6669/1) because
without that, you get a bunch of compiler warnings.
Except 6669/1 still suffers from "%#08llx". For a value of one, that prints:
0x000001
five zeros following the 0x rather than seven. The width in the format
string includes the 0x prefix.
Ah, sorry, I only fixed one case and forgot about the rest (and
misleading Will).
--
Catalin