Re: [RFC] LKMM: Add volatile_if()
From: Nick Desaulniers <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-09 17:32:49
Also in:
linux-toolchains, lkml
From: Nick Desaulniers <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-09 17:32:49
Also in:
linux-toolchains, lkml
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:20 AM Segher Boessenkool [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:13:00PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:quoted
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:33, Segher Boessenkool [off-list ref] wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
An alternative design would be to use a statement attribute to only enforce (C) ("__attribute__((mustcontrol))" ?).Statement attributes only exist for empty statements. It is unclear how (and if!) we could support it for general statements.Statement attributes can apply to anything -- Clang has had them apply to non-empty statements for a while.First off, it is not GCC's problem if LLVM decides to use a GCC extension in some non-compatible way.
Reminds me of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whu19Du_rZ-zBtGsXAB-Qo7NtoJjQjd-Sa9OB5u1Cq_Zw@mail.gmail.com/ (local) -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers