Re: [RFC] LKMM: Add volatile_if()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-06-04 13:56:35
Also in:
linux-toolchains, lkml
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 02:44:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 01:31:48PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 11:44:00AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 12:12:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
quoted
Usage of volatile_if requires the @cond to be headed by a volatile load (READ_ONCE() / atomic_read() etc..) such that the compiler is forced to emit the load and the branch emitted will have the required data-dependency. Furthermore, volatile_if() is a compiler barrier, which should prohibit the compiler from lifting anything out of the selection statement.When building with LTO on arm64, we already upgrade READ_ONCE() to an RCpc acquire. In this case, it would be really good to avoid having the dummy conditional branch somehow, but I can't see a good way to achieve that.#ifdef CONFIG_LTO /* Because __READ_ONCE() is load-acquire */ #define volatile_cond(cond) (cond) #else .... #endif Doesn't work? Bit naf, but I'm thinking it ought to do.The problem is with relaxed atomic RMWs; we don't upgrade those to acquire atm as they're written in asm, but we'd need volatile_cond() to work with them. It's a shame, because we only have RCsc RMWs on arm64, so it would be a bit more expensive.
Urgh, I see. Compiler can't really help in that case either I'm afraid. They'll never want to modify loads that originate in an asm(). They'll say to use the C11 _Atomic crud.