On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

+asmlinkage int compat_sys_personality(compat_ulong_t personality)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32 &&
+		personality == PER_LINUX)
+		personality = PER_LINUX32;
+	ret = sys_personality(personality);
+	if (ret == PER_LINUX32)
+		ret = PER_LINUX;
+	return ret;
+}

Where did you get this from?

You should not need compat_sys_personality, just call the native function.

Hmm, but in that case an aarch32 application doing a personality(PER_LINUX)
syscall will start seeing the wrong uname.

Coming back at this topic, I noticed another issue. Jiri Kosina
has recently posted patches to fix this function in the other architectures

Yeah, there were quite a few broken ones, some of them since the beginning 
of time.

in order to mask out the other personality bits, which is a correct fix,
but the above function is odd for other reasons.

* On MIPS, it is used only for compat tasks, like you have it above.
* On PA-RISC, it is used for native 32 bit tasks and for compat 32 bit tasks,
  but not for native 64 bit ones.
* On IA64, it was used for compat tasks (support for which has since
  been removed from the kernel), plus all 32 bit tasks would start with
  PER_LINUX32.
* On PowerPC, Sparc and s390, it is used for native 64 bit tasks and for
  compat 32 bit tasks, but not for native 32 bit ones.
* On Tile, it was never used.
* On x86_64, it used to be defined (copied from ia64) but not used
  throughout the git history.

The semantics of the function are also interesting: The intention seems
to be that to a compat task, PER_LINUX32 would appear as PER_LINUX.
The effect is that any process can set PER_LINUX32 but it can never
be unset except by a 64 bit MIPS or PA-RISC task.

Since x86_64 does not implement this behavior at all, I suspect that
there are now lots of things depending on not having it, while all
the other architectures might also have some (even predating the
x86_64 port) use cases that depend on depend on not being able to
observe PER_LINUX32 in 32 bit compat tasks.

I think we should try to agree on how this is all supposed to work
and use common code, either put the ppc/sparc/s390 version into
sys_personality, or remove all of them and just do what x86 and tile
do, using the regular sys_personality for all tasks.

How about rather introducing common compat_sys_personality() and switching 
the archs that are using it to it? Unifying the behavior (PER_LINUX / 
PER_LINUX32 masquerading) should be painless.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs