On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:37:39PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:

On 06/04/2012 04:02 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

quoted

quoted

However, I do want to emphasize that this isn't generic code. So how about
an "arch_" prefix instead? Something like:
arch_cpu_pre_starting(), arch_cpu_pre_online() and arch_cpu_post_online()?

Yes, please.

Sure, queued up for v2. (Atm, figuring out how to deal with xen (patch 5). Once
that gets done, will post a v2.)

Since there is dependency on ipi_call_lock cleanup patches
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133827595625509&w=2

So please feel free to include the patches into yours.

And It will be better that Thomas could pick them up :)

Thanks,
Yong

quoted

Otherwise, thanks for that work!

We are glad that it helps :-)

quoted

From the first glance, it's not
colliding much with the changes I have in the pipeline, but I will
have a closer look.

Great! Thanks a lot for your time, Thomas!
 
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Only stand for myself