Re: [PATCH v2 31/32] libluo: introduce luoctl

Hi Pasha,

On Tue, Aug 05 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:

quoted

To add some context: one of the reasons to include it in the series as
an RFC at the end was to showcase the userspace side of the API and have
a way for people to see how it can be used. Seeing an API in action
provides useful context for reviewing patches.

I think Pasha forgot to add the RFC tags when he created v2, since it is
only meant to be RFC right now and not proper patches.

Correct, I accidently removed RFC from memfd patches in the version. I
will include memfd preservation as RFCv1 in v3 submission.

I didn't mean this for the memfd patches, only for libluo.

I think the memfd patches are in decent shape. They aren't pristine, but
I do think they are good enough to land and be improved iteratively.

If you think otherwise, then what do you reckon needs to be done to make
them _not_ RFC?

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav