Re: [PATCH v2 14/32] liveupdate: luo_files: add infrastructure for FDs
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-07-29 17:33:23
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 02:46:27PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
+/**
+ * struct liveupdate_file_ops - Callbacks for for live-updatable files.
+ * @prepare: Optional. Saves state for a specific file instance (@file,
+ * @arg) before update, potentially returning value via @data.
+ * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on failure.
+ * @freeze: Optional. Performs final actions just before kernel
+ * transition, potentially reading/updating the handle via
+ * @data.
+ * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on failure.
+ * @cancel: Optional. Cleans up state/resources if update is aborted
+ * after prepare/freeze succeeded, using the @data handle (by
+ * value) from the successful prepare. Returns void.
+ * @finish: Optional. Performs final cleanup in the new kernel using the
+ * preserved @data handle (by value). Returns void.
+ * @retrieve: Retrieve the preserved file. Must be called before finish.
+ * @can_preserve: callback to determine if @file with associated context (@arg)
+ * can be preserved by this handler.
+ * Return bool (true if preservable, false otherwise).
+ */
+struct liveupdate_file_ops {
+ int (*prepare)(struct file *file, void *arg, u64 *data);
+ int (*freeze)(struct file *file, void *arg, u64 *data);
+ void (*cancel)(struct file *file, void *arg, u64 data);
+ void (*finish)(struct file *file, void *arg, u64 data, bool reclaimed);
+ int (*retrieve)(void *arg, u64 data, struct file **file);
+ bool (*can_preserve)(struct file *file, void *arg);
+};ops structures often have an owner = THIS_MODULE It wouldn't hurt to add it here too, and some appropriate module_get's though I didn't try to figure what happens if userspace races a module unload with other luo operations.
+ +/** + * struct liveupdate_file_handler - Represents a handler for a live-updatable + * file type. + * @ops: Callback functions + * @compatible: The compatibility string (e.g., "memfd-v1", "vfiofd-v1") + * that uniquely identifies the file type this handler supports. + * This is matched against the compatible string associated with + * individual &struct liveupdate_file instances. + * @arg: An opaque pointer to implementation-specific context data + * associated with this file handler registration.
Why? This is not the normal way, if you want context data then allocate a struct driver_liveupdate_file_handler and embed a normal struct liveupdate_file_handler inside it, then use container_of.
+ fdt_for_each_subnode(file_node_offset, luo_file_fdt_in, 0) {
+ bool handler_found = false;
+ u64 token;
+
+ node_name = fdt_get_name(luo_file_fdt_in, file_node_offset,
+ NULL);
+ if (!node_name) {
+ panic("FDT subnode at offset %d: Cannot get name\n",
+ file_node_offset);I think this approach will raise lots of questions.. I'd introduce a new function "luo_deserialize_failure" that does panic internally. Only called by places that are parsing the FDT & related but run into trouble that cannot be savely recovered from. Jason