Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 8 authors, 2025-05-17

Re: [PATCH 2/3] lsm: introduce security_lsm_manage_policy hook

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: 2025-05-07 10:40:32
Also in: linux-security-module, lkml

On 2025/05/06 23:32, Maxime Bélair wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/security/lsm_syscalls.c b/security/lsm_syscalls.c
index dcaad8818679..b39e6635a7d5 100644
--- a/security/lsm_syscalls.c
+++ b/security/lsm_syscalls.c
@@ -122,5 +122,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(lsm_list_modules, u64 __user *, ids, u32 __user *, size,
 SYSCALL_DEFINE5(lsm_manage_policy, u32, lsm_id, u32, op, void __user *, buf, u32
 		__user *, size, u32, flags)
 {
-	return 0;
+	size_t usize;
+
+	if (get_user(usize, size))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	return security_lsm_manage_policy(lsm_id, op, buf, usize, flags);
 }
syzbot will report user-controlled unbounded huge size memory allocation attempt. ;-)

This interface might be fine for AppArmor, but TOMOYO won't use this interface because
TOMOYO's policy is line-oriented ASCII text data where the destination is switched via
pseudo‑filesystem's filename; use of filename helps restricting which type of policy
can be manipulated by which process.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help