Thread (222 messages) 222 messages, 21 authors, 2022-11-03

Re: [PATCH v2 07/39] x86/cet: Add user control-protection fault handler

From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2022-10-05 22:45:48
Also in: linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml

On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 11:39 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:29:04PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index d62b2cb85cea..b7dde8730236 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -229,16 +223,74 @@ enum cp_error_code {
 	CP_ENCL	     = 1 << 15,
 };
 
-DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK
+static const char * const control_protection_err[] = {
+	"unknown",
+	"near-ret",
+	"far-ret/iret",
+	"endbranch",
+	"rstorssp",
+	"setssbsy",
+};
+
+static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(cpf_rate,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
+			      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+
+static void do_user_control_protection_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
+					     unsigned long error_code)
 {
-	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_IBT)) {
-		pr_err("Unexpected #CP\n");
-		BUG();
+	struct task_struct *tsk;
+	unsigned long ssp;
+
+	/* Read SSP before enabling interrupts. */
+	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
+
+	cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
+
+	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "User-mode control protection fault with
shadow support disabled\n");
+
+	tsk = current;
+	tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
+	tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_CP;
+
+	/* Ratelimit to prevent log spamming. */
+	if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV) &&
+	    __ratelimit(&cpf_rate)) {
+		unsigned int cpec;
+
+		cpec = error_code & CP_EC;
+		if (cpec >= ARRAY_SIZE(control_protection_err))
+			cpec = 0;
+
+		pr_emerg("%s[%d] control protection ip:%lx sp:%lx
ssp:%lx error:%lx(%s)%s",
+			 tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
+			 regs->ip, regs->sp, ssp, error_code,
+			 control_protection_err[cpec],
+			 error_code & CP_ENCL ? " in enclave" : "");
+		print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", regs->ip);
+		pr_cont("\n");
 	}
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(user_mode(regs) || (error_code & CP_EC) !=
CP_ENDBR))
-		return;
Why are you removing the (error_code & CP_EC) != CP_ENDBR check from
the
kernel handler?
Argh. It was accidentally removed with the user_mode() check. I'll fix
it.
quoted
+	force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, SEGV_CPERR, (void __user *)0);
+	cond_local_irq_disable(regs);
+}
+#else
+static void do_user_control_protection_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
+					     unsigned long error_code)
+{
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "User-mode control protection fault with shadow
support disabled\n");
+}
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
+
+static __ro_after_init bool ibt_fatal = true;
+
+extern void ibt_selftest_ip(void); /* code label defined in asm
below */
 
+static void do_kernel_control_protection_fault(struct pt_regs
*regs)
+{
 	if (unlikely(regs->ip == (unsigned long)&ibt_selftest_ip)) {
 		regs->ax = 0;
 		return;
@@ -283,9 +335,29 @@ static int __init ibt_setup(char *str)
 }
 
 __setup("ibt=", ibt_setup);
-
+#else
+static void do_kernel_control_protection_fault(struct pt_regs
*regs)
+{
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "Kernel-mode control protection fault with IBT
disabled\n");
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT */
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT) ||
defined(CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK)
+DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
+{
+	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_IBT) &&
+	    !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
+		pr_err("Unexpected #CP\n");
+		BUG();
+	}
+
+	if (user_mode(regs))
+		do_user_control_protection_fault(regs, error_code);
+	else
+		do_kernel_control_protection_fault(regs);
These function names are weirdly long, surely they can do without the
_fault part at the very least. And as stated above, I would really
like
the kernel thing to retain the error_code argument.
I can shorten them. Thanks.
quoted
+}
+#endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT) ||
defined(CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK) */
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help