Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] KVM: Handle page fault for private memory
From: Chao Peng <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-21 09:50:31
Also in:
kvm, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml, qemu-devel
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 04:08:10PM -0700, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
quoted
quoted
Hmm, so a new slot->arch.page_attr array shouldn't be necessary, KVM can instead update slot->arch.lpage_info on shared<->private conversions. Detecting whether a given range is partially mapped could get nasty if KVM defers tracking to the backing store, but if KVM itself does the tracking as was previously suggested[*], then updating lpage_info should be relatively straightfoward, e.g. use xa_for_each_range() to see if a given 2mb/1gb range is completely covered (fully shared) or not covered at all (fully private). [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YofeZps9YXgtP3f1@google.com (local)Yes, slot->arch.page_attr was introduced to help identify whether a page is completely shared/private at given level. It seems XARRAY can serve the same purpose, though I know nothing about it. Looking forward to seeing the patch of using XARRAY. yes, update slot->arch.lpage_info is good to utilize the existing logic and Isaku has applied it to slot->arch.lpage_info for 2MB support patches.Chao, are you planning to implement these changes to ensure proper handling of hugepages partially mapped as private/shared in subsequent versions of this series? Or is this something left to be handled by the architecture specific code?
Ah, the topic gets moved to a different place. I should update here. There were more discussions under TDX KVM patch series and I actually just sent out the draft code for this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/7/20/610 That patch is based on UPM v7 here. If I can get more feedbacks there then I will include an udpated version in UPM v8. If you have bandwdith, you can also play with that patch, any feedback is welcome. Chao
Regards, Vishal