On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:02:54PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
quoted
I think the correct approach is to not do the locking automatically for SHM_F_INACCESSIBLE,
and instead require userspace to do shmctl(.., SHM_LOCK, ...) if userspace knows the
consumers don't support migrate/swap. That'd require wrapping migrate_page() and then
wiring up notifier hooks for migrate/swap, but IMO that's a good thing to get sorted
out sooner than later. KVM isn't planning on support migrate/swap for TDX or SNP,
but supporting at least migrate for a software-only implementation a la pKVM should
be relatively straightforward. On the notifiee side, KVM can terminate the VM if it
gets an unexpected migrate/swap, e.g. so that TDX/SEV VMs don't die later with
exceptions and/or data corruption (pre-SNP SEV guests) in the guest.
SHM_LOCK sounds like a good match.
Emm, no. shmctl(2) and SHM_LOCK are SysV IPC thing. I don't see how they
fit here.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov