Thread (116 messages) 116 messages, 15 authors, 2022-07-25

Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] KVM: Expose KVM_MEM_PRIVATE

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: 2022-03-29 19:13:09
Also in: kvm, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml, qemu-devel

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, Chao Peng wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
KVM_MEM_PRIVATE is not exposed by default but architecture code can turn
on it by implementing kvm_arch_private_memory_supported().

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <redacted>
---
 include/linux/kvm_host.h |  1 +
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 186b9b981a65..0150e952a131 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ bool kvm_arch_dy_has_pending_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvm_arch_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
 void kvm_arch_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_arch_create_vm_debugfs(struct kvm *kvm);
+bool kvm_arch_private_memory_supported(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 #ifndef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC
 /*
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 52319f49d58a..df5311755a40 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1485,10 +1485,19 @@ static void kvm_replace_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
 	}
 }
 
-static int check_memory_region_flags(const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
+bool __weak kvm_arch_private_memory_supported(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
+static int check_memory_region_flags(struct kvm *kvm,
+				const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
 {
 	u32 valid_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
 
+	if (kvm_arch_private_memory_supported(kvm))
+		valid_flags |= KVM_MEM_PRIVATE;
+
 #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_READONLY_MEM
 	valid_flags |= KVM_MEM_READONLY;
 #endif
@@ -1900,7 +1909,7 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 	int as_id, id;
 	int r;
 
-	r = check_memory_region_flags(mem);
+	r = check_memory_region_flags(kvm, mem);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
 
@@ -1913,10 +1922,12 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (mem->guest_phys_addr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	/* We can read the guest memory with __xxx_user() later on. */
 	if ((mem->userspace_addr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) ||
-	    (mem->userspace_addr != untagged_addr(mem->userspace_addr)) ||
-	     !access_ok((void __user *)(unsigned long)mem->userspace_addr,
+	    (mem->userspace_addr != untagged_addr(mem->userspace_addr)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	/* We can read the guest memory with __xxx_user() later on. */
+	if (!(mem->flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE) &&
+	    !access_ok((void __user *)(unsigned long)mem->userspace_addr,
This should sanity check private_offset for private memslots.  At a bare minimum,
wrapping should be disallowed.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 			mem->memory_size))
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (as_id >= KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM || id >= KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM)
@@ -1957,6 +1968,9 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 		if ((kvm->nr_memslot_pages + npages) < kvm->nr_memslot_pages)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	} else { /* Modify an existing slot. */
+		/* Private memslots are immutable, they can only be deleted. */
+		if (mem->flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE)
+			return -EINVAL;
These sanity checks belong in "KVM: Register private memslot to memory backing store",
e.g. that patch is "broken" without the immutability restriction.  It's somewhat moot
because the code is unreachable, but it makes reviewing confusing/difficult.

But rather than move the sanity checks back, I think I'd prefer to pull all of patch 10
here.  I think it also makes sense to drop "KVM: Use memfile_pfn_ops to obtain pfn for
private pages" and add the pointer in "struct kvm_memory_slot" in patch "KVM: Extend the
memslot to support fd-based private memory", with the use of the ops folded into
"KVM: Handle page fault for private memory".  Adding code to KVM and KVM-x86 in a single
patch is ok, and overall makes things easier to review because the new helpers have a
user right away, especially since there will be #ifdeffery.

I.e. end up with something like:

  mm: Introduce memfile_notifier
  mm/shmem: Restrict MFD_INACCESSIBLE memory against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  KVM: Extend the memslot to support fd-based private memory
  KVM: Use kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext
  KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_ERROR exit
  KVM: Handle page fault for private memory
  KVM: Register private memslot to memory backing store
  KVM: Zap existing KVM mappings when pages changed in the private fd
  KVM: Enable and expose KVM_MEM_PRIVATE
 		if ((mem->userspace_addr != old->userspace_addr) ||
 		    (npages != old->npages) ||
 		    ((mem->flags ^ old->flags) & KVM_MEM_READONLY))
-- 
2.17.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help