Re: [Patch v4 1/3] lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs
From: Jesse Brandeburg <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-01 02:22:03
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml, netdev
From: Jesse Brandeburg <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-01 02:22:03
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml, netdev
Nitesh Lal wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:21 PM Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Nitesh, On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 12:14, Nitesh Lal wrote:quoted
Based on this analysis and the fact that with your re-work the interrupts seems to be naturally spread across the CPUs, will it be safe to revert Jesse's patch e2e64a932 genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint() as it overwrites the previously set IRQ affinity mask for some of the devices?That's a good question. My gut feeling says yes.Jesse do you want to send the revert for the patch? Also, I think it was you who suggested cc'ing intel-wired-lan ml as that allows intel folks, to do some initial testing? If so, we can do that here (IMHO).
Patch sent here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210501021832.743094-1-jesse.brandeburg@intel.com/T/#u (local) Any testing appreciated! Jesse