Thread (44 messages) 44 messages, 9 authors, 2021-05-03

Re: [Patch v4 1/3] lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: 2021-01-27 12:01:20
Also in: linux-pci, lkml

Hi,

On 2020-06-25 23:34, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Alex Belits <redacted>

The current implementation of cpumask_local_spread() does not respect the
isolated CPUs, i.e., even if a CPU has been isolated for Real-Time task,
it will return it to the caller for pinning of its IRQ threads. Having
these unwanted IRQ threads on an isolated CPU adds up to a latency
overhead.

Restrict the CPUs that are returned for spreading IRQs only to the
available housekeeping CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Alex Belits <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <redacted>
---
  lib/cpumask.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
index fb22fb266f93..85da6ab4fbb5 100644
--- a/lib/cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  #include <linux/export.h>
  #include <linux/memblock.h>
  #include <linux/numa.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
  
  /**
   * cpumask_next - get the next cpu in a cpumask
@@ -205,22 +206,27 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
   */
  unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
  {
-	int cpu;
+	int cpu, hk_flags;
+	const struct cpumask *mask;
  
+	hk_flags = HK_FLAG_DOMAIN | HK_FLAG_MANAGED_IRQ;
+	mask = housekeeping_cpumask(hk_flags);
AFAICS, this generally resolves to something based on cpu_possible_mask rather than cpu_online_mask as before, so could now potentially return an offline CPU. Was that an intentional change?

I was just looking at the current code since I had the rare presence of mind to check if something suitable already existed before I start open-coding "any online CPU, but local node preferred" logic for handling IRQ affinity in a driver - cpumask_local_spread() appears to be almost what I want (if a bit more heavyweight), if only it would actually guarantee an online CPU as the kerneldoc claims :(

Robin.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  	/* Wrap: we always want a cpu. */
-	i %= num_online_cpus();
+	i %= cpumask_weight(mask);
  
  	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
-		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask)
+		for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
  			if (i-- == 0)
  				return cpu;
+		}
  	} else {
  		/* NUMA first. */
-		for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask)
+		for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node), mask) {
  			if (i-- == 0)
  				return cpu;
+		}
  
-		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
+		for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
  			/* Skip NUMA nodes, done above. */
  			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node)))
  				continue;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help