On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:02:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:10 PM Keith Busch [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
config ACPI_HMAT
bool "ACPI Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table Support"
depends on ACPI_NUMA
+ select HMEM_REPORTING
If you want to do this here, I'm not sure that defining HMEM_REPORTING
as a user-selectable option is a good idea. In particular, I don't
really think that setting ACPI_HMAT without it makes a lot of sense.
Apart from this, the patch looks reasonable to me.
I'm trying to implement based on the feedback, but I'm a little confused.
As I have it at the moment, HMEM_REPORTING is not user-prompted, so
another option needs to turn it on. I have ACPI_HMAT do that here.
So when you say it's a bad idea to make HMEM_REPORTING user selectable,
isn't it already not user selectable?
If I do it the other way around, that's going to make HMEM_REPORTING
complicated if a non-ACPI implementation wants to report HMEM
properties.