Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add utilization clamping for FAIR tasks
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-01-22 11:05:10
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-01-22 11:05:10
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:02 PM Patrick Bellasi [off-list ref] wrote:
On 22-Jan 11:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 11:15:05 AM CET Patrick Bellasi wrote:
[cut]
quoted
IMO it would be better to combine this patch with the next one.Main reason was to better document in the changelog what we do for the two different classes...quoted
At least some things in it I was about to ask about would go away then. :-)... but if it creates confusion I can certainly merge them. Or maybe clarify better in this patch what's not clear: may I ask what were your questions ?quoted
Besides, I don't really see a reason for the split here.Was mainly to make the changes required for RT more self-contained. For that class only, not for FAIR, we have additional code in the following patch which add uclamp_default_perf which are system defaults used to track/account tasks requesting the maximum frequency. Again, I can either better clarify the above patch or just merge the two together: what do you prefer ?
Merge the two together, please.