Re: [PATCH v6 04/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2019-01-21 16:12:46
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:23:11PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
On 21-Jan 15:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:15:01AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:quoted
@@ -835,6 +954,28 @@ static void uclamp_bucket_inc(struct uclamp_se *uc_se, unsigned int clamp_id, } while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&uc_maps[bucket_id].adata, &uc_map_old.data, uc_map_new.data)); + /* + * Ensure each CPU tracks the correct value for this clamp bucket. + * This initialization of per-CPU variables is required only when a + * clamp value is requested for the first time from a slow-path. + */I'm confused; why is this needed?That's a lazy initialization of the per-CPU uclamp data for a given bucket, i.e. the clamp value assigned to a bucket, which happens only when new clamp values are requested... usually only at system boot/configuration time. For example, let say we have these buckets mapped to given clamp values: bucket_#0: clamp value: 10% (mapped) bucket_#1: clamp value: 20% (mapped) bucket_#2: clamp value: 30% (mapped) and then let's assume all the users of bucket_#1 are "destroyed", i.e. there are no more tasks, system defaults or cgroups asking for a 20% clamp value. The corresponding bucket will become free: bucket_#0: clamp value: 10% (mapped) bucket_#1: clamp value: 20% (free) bucket_#2: clamp value: 30% (mapped) If, in the future, we ask for a new clamp value, let say a task ask for a 40% clamp value, then we need to map that value into a bucket. Since bucket_#1 is free we can use it to fill up the hold and keep all the buckets in use at the beginning of a cache line. However, since now bucket_#1 tracks a different clamp value (40 instead of 20) we need to walk all the CPUs and updated the cached value: bucket_#0: clamp value: 10% (mapped) bucket_#1: clamp value: 40% (mapped) bucket_#2: clamp value: 30% (mapped) Is that more clear ?
Yes, and I realized this a little while after sending this; but I'm not sure I have an answer to why though. That is; why isn't the whole thing hard coded to have: bucket_n: clamp value: n*UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA We already do that division anyway (clamp_value / UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA), and from that we instantly have the right bucket index. And that allows us to initialize all this beforehand.
and keep all the buckets in use at the beginning of a cache line.
That; is that the rationale for all this? Note that per the defaults everything is in a single line already.