Thread (89 messages) 89 messages, 6 authors, 2019-01-25

Re: [PATCH v6 04/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2019-01-21 16:12:46
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:23:11PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
On 21-Jan 15:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:15:01AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
quoted
@@ -835,6 +954,28 @@ static void uclamp_bucket_inc(struct uclamp_se *uc_se, unsigned int clamp_id,
 	} while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&uc_maps[bucket_id].adata,
 					  &uc_map_old.data, uc_map_new.data));
 
+	/*
+	 * Ensure each CPU tracks the correct value for this clamp bucket.
+	 * This initialization of per-CPU variables is required only when a
+	 * clamp value is requested for the first time from a slow-path.
+	 */
I'm confused; why is this needed?
That's a lazy initialization of the per-CPU uclamp data for a given
bucket, i.e. the clamp value assigned to a bucket, which happens only
when new clamp values are requested... usually only at system
boot/configuration time.

For example, let say we have these buckets mapped to given clamp
values:

 bucket_#0: clamp value: 10% (mapped)
 bucket_#1: clamp value: 20% (mapped)
 bucket_#2: clamp value: 30% (mapped)

and then let's assume all the users of bucket_#1 are "destroyed", i.e.
there are no more tasks, system defaults or cgroups asking for a
20% clamp value. The corresponding bucket will become free:

 bucket_#0: clamp value: 10% (mapped)
 bucket_#1: clamp value: 20% (free)
 bucket_#2: clamp value: 30% (mapped)

If, in the future, we ask for a new clamp value, let say a task ask
for a 40% clamp value, then we need to map that value into a bucket.
Since bucket_#1 is free we can use it to fill up the hold and keep all
the buckets in use at the beginning of a cache line.

However, since now bucket_#1 tracks a different clamp value (40
instead of 20) we need to walk all the CPUs and updated the cached
value:

 bucket_#0: clamp value: 10% (mapped)
 bucket_#1: clamp value: 40% (mapped)
 bucket_#2: clamp value: 30% (mapped)

Is that more clear ?
Yes, and I realized this a little while after sending this; but I'm not
sure I have an answer to why though.

That is; why isn't the whole thing hard coded to have:

 bucket_n: clamp value: n*UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA

We already do that division anyway (clamp_value / UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA),
and from that we instantly have the right bucket index. And that allows
us to initialize all this beforehand.
and keep all
the buckets in use at the beginning of a cache line.
That; is that the rationale for all this? Note that per the defaults
everything is in a single line already.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help