Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET
From: Yu-cheng Yu <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-12 22:40:58
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
From: Yu-cheng Yu <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-12 22:40:58
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 16:03 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Yu-cheng Yu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c index e2ee403865eb..ac2bc3a18427 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c@@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ enum x86_regset {REGSET_IOPERM64 = REGSET_XFP, REGSET_XSTATE, REGSET_TLS, + REGSET_CET64 = REGSET_TLS, REGSET_IOPERM32, + REGSET_CET32, };Why does REGSET_CET64 alias on REGSET_TLS?In x86_64_regsets[], there is no [REGSET_TLS]. The core dump code cannot handle holes in the array.Is there a fundamental (ABI) reason for that?
What I did was, ran Linux with 'slub_debug', and forced a core dump (kill -abrt <pid>), then there was a red zone warning in the dmesg. My feeling is there could be issues in the core dump code. These enum's are only local to arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c and not exported. I am not aware this is in the ABI.
quoted
quoted
to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"), not to CFE?I don't know if I can change that, will find out.So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference. Or something like that.
Ok, I will make changes in the next version and probably revise from that if still not optimal. Yu-cheng