Thread (123 messages) 123 messages, 12 authors, 2018-08-14

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET

From: Yu-cheng Yu <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-12 22:40:58
Also in: linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml

On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 16:03 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Yu-cheng Yu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index e2ee403865eb..ac2bc3a18427 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ enum x86_regset {
 	REGSET_IOPERM64 = REGSET_XFP,
 	REGSET_XSTATE,
 	REGSET_TLS,
+	REGSET_CET64 = REGSET_TLS,
 	REGSET_IOPERM32,
+	REGSET_CET32,
 };
Why does REGSET_CET64 alias on REGSET_TLS?
In x86_64_regsets[], there is no [REGSET_TLS].  The core dump code
cannot handle holes in the array.
Is there a fundamental (ABI) reason for that?
What I did was, ran Linux with 'slub_debug', and forced a core dump
(kill -abrt <pid>), then there was a red zone warning in the dmesg.
My feeling is there could be issues in the core dump code.  These
enum's are only local to arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c and not exported.
I am not aware this is in the ABI.
quoted
quoted
to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"),
not to CFE?
I don't know if I can change that, will find out.
So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal 
names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET 
if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference.

Or something like that.
Ok, I will make changes in the next version and probably revise
from that if still not optimal.

Yu-cheng
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help