On Monday, June 30, 2014 09:05:38 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:28 AM, David Drysdale [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
If the LSM does not provide implementations of the .file_lookup and
.file_install LSM hooks, always use the Capsicum implementations.
The Capsicum implementation of file_lookup checks for a Capsicum
capability wrapper file and unwraps to if the appropriate rights
are available.
The Capsicum implementation of file_install checks whether the file
has restricted rights associated with it. If it does, it is replaced
with a Capsicum capability wrapper file before installation into the
fdtable.
I think I fall on the "no LSM" side of the fence. This kind of stuff
should be available regardless of selected LSM (as it is in your
code) ...
I agree. Looking quickly at the patches, the code seems to take an odd
approach of living largely outside the LSM framework, but then relying on a
couple of LSM hooks. Capsicum should either live fully as a LSM or fully
outside of it, this mix seems a bit silly to me.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com