On Monday, June 30, 2014 09:05:38 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote:

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:28 AM, David Drysdale [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

If the LSM does not provide implementations of the .file_lookup and
.file_install LSM hooks, always use the Capsicum implementations.

The Capsicum implementation of file_lookup checks for a Capsicum
capability wrapper file and unwraps to if the appropriate rights
are available.

The Capsicum implementation of file_install checks whether the file
has restricted rights associated with it.  If it does, it is replaced
with a Capsicum capability wrapper file before installation into the
fdtable.

I think I fall on the "no LSM" side of the fence.  This kind of stuff
should be available regardless of selected LSM (as it is in your
code) ...

I agree.  Looking quickly at the patches, the code seems to take an odd 
approach of living largely outside the LSM framework, but then relying on a 
couple of LSM hooks.  Capsicum should either live fully as a LSM or fully 
outside of it, this mix seems a bit silly to me.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com