@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ TECH_DOCS += technical/long-running-process-protocol
 TECH_DOCS += technical/multi-pack-index
 TECH_DOCS += technical/packfile-uri
 TECH_DOCS += technical/pack-heuristics
+TECH_DOCS += technical/paint-down-to-common
 TECH_DOCS += technical/parallel-checkout
 TECH_DOCS += technical/partial-clone
 TECH_DOCS += technical/platform-support

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ articles = [
   'multi-pack-index.adoc',
   'packfile-uri.adoc',
   'pack-heuristics.adoc',
+  'paint-down-to-common.adoc',
   'parallel-checkout.adoc',
   'partial-clone.adoc',
   'platform-support.adoc',

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+Merge-Base Computation and paint_down_to_common()
+==================================================
+
+The function `paint_down_to_common()` in `commit-reach.c` computes merge
+bases by walking the commit graph backwards from two sets of tips and
+finding where their ancestry meets.
+
+Use cases
+---------
+
+Computing merge bases is used in two different ways:
+
+ 1. *Finding all merge bases* (`merge-base --all`, `merge-tree`,
+    `merge`, `rebase`). A merge base is a common ancestor that is
+    not itself an ancestor of another common ancestor.
+
+ 2. *Ancestry checks* (`in_merge_bases`, used by `merge-base
+    --is-ancestor`, `branch -d`, `fetch`). These ask: "is commit A
+    an ancestor of commit B?" If a common ancestor equals one of the
+    inputs, that input is necessarily the only merge base -- no other
+    common ancestor can be both as recent and not an ancestor of it.
+
+Both use cases share the same algorithm and implementation.
+
+Algorithm
+---------
+
+Given a commit `one` and a set of commits `twos[]`, the walk paints
+commits with two colors:
+
+  - PARENT1: reachable from `one`
+  - PARENT2: reachable from any commit in `twos[]`
+
+The walk uses a priority queue ordered by generation number (falling
+back to commit date when generation numbers are unavailable). Each
+step dequeues the highest-priority commit (this is when we say a
+commit is "visited") and propagates its paint flags to its parents,
+enqueuing them if they gained new flags. When a commit receives
+both PARENT1 and PARENT2, it is a merge-base candidate. A candidate
+gains the STALE flag so its ancestors propagate staleness -- any
+deeper common ancestor is necessarily redundant.
+
+INFINITY and finite generation regions
+--------------------------------------
+
+The commit-graph stores a generation number for each commit. Commits
+not in the commit-graph have generation `GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY`. The
+graph is closed under reachability: if a commit is in the graph, all
+its ancestors are too. This partitions the commit graph into two regions:
+
+....
+    +---------------------------------------+
+    |          INFINITY region              |
+    |  generation = INFINITY                |
+    |  queue order: heuristic (commit date) |
+    +---------------------------------------+
+                    |
+                    v
+    +---------------------------------------+
+    |          Finite region                |
+    |  generation = finite                  |
+    |  queue order: topological             |
+    +---------------------------------------+
+....
+
+When the commit-graph is enabled, the INFINITY region is typically
+very small -- it only contains commits added since the last
+commit-graph refresh.
+
+All reachable INFINITY-generation commits are visited before any
+finite-generation commit, because INFINITY is larger than any finite
+value. Once the walk crosses into the finite region, it stays there.
+
+In the finite region, generation ordering guarantees topological
+traversal: children are always visited before their parents. This
+means that paint on already-visited commits is final -- no future
+traversal step can add paint to them.
+
+In the INFINITY region, commit-date ordering can violate this: a
+parent with a later date can be visited before a child with an earlier
+date. Paint flags are therefore NOT final at visit time, and a
+commit visited with only one side's paint may later gain the other.
+
+Paint flags are only added, never removed. Since each flag can be set
+at most once per commit, the number of times a commit can be
+re-enqueued is bounded by the number of flag transitions.
+
+Termination
+-----------
+
+The walk uses a `nonstale_queue` wrapper around `prio_queue` that
+tracks `max_nonstale`: the lowest-priority non-stale commit enqueued
+so far. Once that commit is dequeued, every remaining entry is known
+to be STALE and the loop terminates. Specifically, the main loop
+ends when one of the following conditions holds:
+
+  1. The queue is empty.
+  2. `max_nonstale` has been dequeued, meaning the queue only contains
+     STALE entries.
+
+Stale entry condition
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Once all queued entries are stale, no new merge-base candidates can
+be discovered -- that requires at least one non-stale commit from
+each side meeting. Continuing the walk could still invalidate
+existing candidates by proving one is an ancestor of another, but
+`remove_redundant()` handles that as a post-processing step, so it
+is safe to exit early.
+
+Related documentation
+---------------------
+
+  - `Documentation/technical/commit-graph.adoc` -- generation numbers
+    and the reachability closure property.

@@ -96,7 +96,11 @@ static struct commit *nonstale_queue_get_dedup(struct nonstale_queue *queue)
 	return commit;
 }
 
-/* all input commits in one and twos[] must have been parsed! */
+/*
+ * See Documentation/technical/paint-down-to-common.adoc
+ *
+ * All input commits in one and twos[] must have been parsed!
+ */
 static int paint_down_to_common(struct repository *r,
 				struct commit *one, int n,
 				struct commit **twos,