On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 09:14:59PM -0500, Eric Ju wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -464,8 +465,33 @@ static int fetch_refs_via_pack(struct transport *transport,
args.server_options = transport->server_options;
args.negotiation_tips = data->options.negotiation_tips;
args.reject_shallow_remote = transport->smart_options->reject_shallow;
+ args.object_info = transport->smart_options->object_info;
+
+ if (transport->smart_options && transport->smart_options->object_info
Coverity complains about the check for a NULL transport->smart_options
here. If it's NULL we'd already have segfaulted a few lines above when
we look at the reject_shallow flag.
Not sure if that's an existing bug in the earlier code or not. ;) Your
extra check can't hurt anything, in the sense that it's just being
overly defensive, but it does make puzzling out the expected value of
smart_options harder.
-Peff