Re: [PATCH 6/7] refs: allow multiple reflog entries for the same refname
From: karthik nayak <hidden>
Date: 2024-12-12 14:52:06
Christian Couder [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 12:11 PM Karthik Nayak [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The reference transaction only allows a update for a given reference tos/a update/an update/ or: s/a update/a single update/
'a single update' sounds the best here, will add.
quoted
avoid conflicts. This, however, isn't an issue for reflogs. There are no conflicts to be resolved in reflogs and when migrating reflogs between backends we'd have multiple reflog entries for the same refname.quoted
@@ -1302,6 +1303,7 @@ static int write_transaction_table(struct reftable_writer *writer, void *cb_data struct ident_split committer_ident = {0}; size_t logs_nr = 0, logs_alloc = 0, i; const char *committer_info; + struct strintmap logs_ts;Here a comment might help explain what logs_ts is used for.
I think with Patricks comment, this whole code will be removed for something simpler.
quoted
int ret = 0; committer_info = git_committer_info(0);@@ -1310,6 +1312,8 @@ static int write_transaction_table(struct reftable_writer *writer, void *cb_data QSORT(arg->updates, arg->updates_nr, transaction_update_cmp); + strintmap_init(&logs_ts, ts);I am not sure I understand what logs_ts is used for and why its default value is set to ts.
The reason I added this was because in the reftable backend, the writer sorts logs before writing. So if the multiple reflogs contained the same update_index, their order might be changed. But for migrating reflogs, we need to ensure we maintain the order. Using a map here, allowed us to increment the update_index for reflogs for a given refname.
Also ts is an uint64_t while the second argument to strintmap_init() is an int. I wonder if it could be an issue especially on 32 bits platforms.
This is fair point, I decided to scrap this ultimately and simply append `u->index` to the update_index. Which would provide the same desired effect.
quoted
reftable_writer_set_limits(writer, ts, ts); for (i = 0; i < arg->updates_nr; i++) {@@ -1391,6 +1395,7 @@ static int write_transaction_table(struct reftable_writer *writer, void *cb_data if (create_reflog) { struct ident_split c; + uint64_t update_index; ALLOC_GROW(logs, logs_nr + 1, logs_alloc); log = &logs[logs_nr++];@@ -1405,7 +1410,11 @@ static int write_transaction_table(struct reftable_writer *writer, void *cb_data } fill_reftable_log_record(log, &c); - log->update_index = ts; + + update_index = strintmap_get(&logs_ts, u->refname); + log->update_index = update_index; + strintmap_set(&logs_ts, u->refname, update_index+1);s/update_index+1/update_index + 1/ Also is the 'update_index' var really needed or could we just do: log->update_index = strintmap_get(&logs_ts, u->refname); strintmap_set(&logs_ts, u->refname, log->update_index + 1); ?
The temp variable can be removed here indeed. But I'll remove all of this in the next version. Thanks
quoted
log->refname = xstrdup(u->refname); memcpy(log->value.update.new_hash, u->new_oid.hash, GIT_MAX_RAWSZ);
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 690 bytes