Re: [PATCH 6/8] midx: pass down `hash_algo` to `get_midx_filename[_ext]`
From: karthik nayak <hidden>
Date: 2024-11-18 16:25:11
shejialuo [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 02:42:19PM +0100, Karthik Nayak wrote: [snip]quoted
diff --git a/midx.h b/midx.h index 78efa28d35371795fa33c68660278182debb60ab..7620820d4d0272926af9e4eeb68bfb73404c7ec2 100644 --- a/midx.h +++ b/midx.h@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ struct object_id; struct pack_entry; struct repository; struct bitmapped_pack; +struct git_hash_algo; #define MIDX_SIGNATURE 0x4d494458 /* "MIDX" */ #define MIDX_VERSION 1@@ -89,8 +90,10 @@ struct multi_pack_index { #define MIDX_EXT_MIDX "midx" const unsigned char *get_midx_checksum(struct multi_pack_index *m); -void get_midx_filename(struct strbuf *out, const char *object_dir); -void get_midx_filename_ext(struct strbuf *out, const char *object_dir, +void get_midx_filename(const struct git_hash_algo *hash_algo, + struct strbuf *out, const char *object_dir); +void get_midx_filename_ext(const struct git_hash_algo *hash_algo, + struct strbuf *out, const char *object_dir, const unsigned char *hash, const char *ext);I don't think it's a good idea to put "hash_algo" in the first argument, we should put it at the last to align with the code style where we use "git_hash_algo".
Could you elaborate on why you think it is not a good idea?
I've mostly done this to stay consistent, because I see `struct
repository *repo` being passed as the first variable in our code base.
Roughly:
$ grep -Iir "struct repository \*r" --include=\*.h | wc -l
524
$ grep -Iir "(struct repository \*r" --include=\*.h | wc -l
327
Since `hash_algo` is similar, I thought it would be nicer to be
consistent.
quoted
void get_midx_chain_dirname(struct strbuf *buf, const char *object_dir); void get_midx_chain_filename(struct strbuf *buf, const char *object_dir);
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 690 bytes