On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 20:30, Victoria Dye [off-list ref] wrote:

Since the interaction isn't clearly defined at the moment, we could probably
still update it to work like you're describing here. I'm happy to drop this
patch and implement your recommendation in a follow-up series. Let me know
what you think!

Regardless of whether the logic is changed in a follow-up series or not
I think the current behavior is worth documenting even if it doesn't
exist for much longer in the tree. So I am favor of having this patch as
part of this series.

I am also in favor of changing the behavior but that warrants a separate
series and discussion.

Øsse