The "res" variable must be true at this point in update_submodule(),
as just a few lines above this we've unconditionally:

	if (!res)
		return 0;

So we don't need to guard the "return 1" with an "else if (res)", we
can return unconditionally at this point. See b3c5f5cb048 (submodule:
move core cmd_update() logic to C, 2022-03-15) for the initial
introduction of this code, this check of "res" has always been
redundant.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted>
---
 builtin/submodule--helper.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
index 07a918f7373..93ab49defb1 100644
--- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c
+++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c

@@ -2448,8 +2448,7 @@ static int update_submodule(struct update_data *update_data)
 			    update_data->displaypath);
 		if (res == 128)
 			exit(res);
-		else if (res)
-			return 1;
+		return 1;
 	}
 
 	return 0;

-- 
2.37.3.1420.g76f8a3d556c