On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I think it's probably redundant to note it at this point but I've given
this a thorough review and it all looks good to me. I left some
comments/musings on minor points in the series, but none of those IMO
require a re-roll except perhaps the duplicate Signed-off-by headers,
depending on what Junio thinks & if he's going to fix those while
queuing.
Thanks, and likewise your parts of this series look good to me
(obviously, or I wouldn't have sent it otherwise ;)).
The duplicate s-o-b's are intentional, but see my response in 2/9 (I'd
link to it, but vger seems to be a little sluggish for me this morning)
for why. If I made an error there, I'm happy to fix it up for Junio.
Thanks,
Taylor