Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] First steps towards partial clone submodules

Looks like Junio did spot some bigger items...which raises a question
for me.  I have a series
(https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.969.git.1622856485.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ (local))
that also touches partial clones.  Our series are semantically
independent, but we both add a repository parameter to
fetch_objects().  So we both make the same change, but you also make
additional nearby changes, resulting in two trivial conflicts.  So,
should I rebase my series on yours, should you rebase on mine, or
should we just let both proceed independently and double-check Junio
resolves the trivial conflicts in favor of your side?

Thoughts?

From [1], looks like this is already resolved, but in any case I think
we can just let both proceed independently since the conflicts are
relatively trivial. If it turns out to be not so trivial, I think Junio
can just let one of us know on-list and whoever it is can rebase on the
other's.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqlf7jnb5u.fsf@gitster.g/ (local)