Thread (139 messages) 139 messages, 5 authors, 2021-04-30

Re: [PATCH 24/30] subtree: don't let debug and progress output clash

From: Luke Shumaker <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-24 00:46:06

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:07:12 -0600,
Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 3:43 PM Luke Shumaker [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Currently, debug output (triggered by passing '-d') and progress output
stomp on eachother.  The debug output is just streamed as lines to
s/eachother/each other/
Ack.
quoted
stderr, and the progress output is sent to stderr as '%s\r'.  It is
difficult to distinguish between the debug output and a progress line.
When writing to a terminal the debug lines hide progress lines.

So, when '-d' has been passed, spit out progress as 'progress: %s\n',
instead of as '%s\r', so that it can be detected, and so that the debug
lines don't overwrite the progress when written to a terminal.
Makes perfect sense when output is to a terminal, though might be
annoying for the person who redirects stderr to a file. Just idly
wondering if it makes sense to take that case into consideration...
(but maybe it doesn't matter much when someone is working at debugging
a problem).
The '%s\r' isn't really useful when written to a file, so this change
is useful in the file case too.  I'll add a comment and update the
commit-message.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Luke Shumaker <redacted>
---
diff --git a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
@@ -53,7 +53,12 @@ debug () {
 progress () {
        if test -z "$GIT_QUIET"
        then
-               printf "%s\r" "$*" >&2
+               if test -n "$arg_debug"
+               then
+                       printf "progress: %s\n" "$*" >&2
+               else
+                       printf "%s\r" "$*" >&2
+               fi
        fi
 }
Subjective (not necessarily worth changing): An `echo` would suffice
in place of `printf "...\n"`:

    echo "progress: $*" >&2
echo would suffice, but I prefer the printf.
It _might_ be worthwhile to have an in-code comment here explaining
why progress() behaves differently in debug mode, especially if the
reader is confused about why one case explicitly emits "progress:" and
the other doesn't.
Adding a comment is a good idea, I'll do that.

-- 
Happy hacking,
~ Luke Shumaker
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help