Thread (164 messages) flat view 164 messages, 7 authors, 2021-09-18

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] builtin/multi-pack-index.c: don't handle 'progress' separately

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-29 11:23:54

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:04:40PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote:
Now that there is a shared 'flags' member in the options structure,
there is no need to keep track of whether to force progress or not,
since ultimately the decision of whether or not to show a progress meter
is controlled by a bit in the flags member.
Just going back to what I wrote for patch 1, I think this "now that
there is a shared flags..." bit is what misled me.

You can easily have done this patch by just manipulating the local
"flags" variable. And the rationale for the patch is "we can get rid of
opts.progress, because nobody ever reads it except to set a bit
opts.flags".

Definitely not worth re-rolling or anything; I'm just explaining my
earlier comments. :)

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help