On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:17 PM Miriam Rubio [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1048,11 +1044,6 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
if (argc > 1)
return error(_("--bisect-reset requires either no argument or a commit"));
return !!bisect_reset(argc ? argv[0] : NULL);
Here we are returning so we never fall back into the BISECT_WRITE case below...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
- case BISECT_WRITE:
- if (argc != 4 && argc != 5)
- return error(_("--bisect-write requires either 4 or 5 arguments"));
- set_terms(&terms, argv[3], argv[2]);
- res = bisect_write(argv[0], argv[1], &terms, nolog);
break;
...so the above "break;" could be removed too.
case CHECK_AND_SET_TERMS:
if (argc != 3)