Re: [PATCH 05/10] p5303: measure time to repack with keep
flat view
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-29 03:41:29
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2021-01-29 · Re: [PATCH 05/10] p5303: measure time to repack with keep · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2021-01-29 · Re: [PATCH 05/10] p5303: measure time to repack with keep · Jeff King <hidden>
- 2021-01-29 · Re: [PATCH 05/10] p5303: measure time to repack with keep · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2021-01-19 · [PATCH 05/10] p5303: measure time to repack with keep · Taylor Blau <hidden>
Taylor Blau [off-list ref] writes:
From: Jeff King <redacted>
Not a fault of this series at all, but before the precontext of the first hunk, there is
quoted hunk
diff --git a/t/perf/p5303-many-packs.sh b/t/perf/p5303-many-packs.sh index 277d22ec4b..85b077b72b 100755 --- a/t/perf/p5303-many-packs.sh +++ b/t/perf/p5303-many-packs.sh@@ -27,8 +27,11 @@ repack_into_n () {
this construct:
... |
sed -n '1~5p' |
head -n "$1" |
...
which is a GNUism. Peff often says that very small population
actually run our perf suite, and this seems to corroborate the
conjecture.
quoted hunk
>pushes && # create base packfile - head -n 1 pushes | - git pack-objects --delta-base-offset --revs staging/pack && + base_pack=$( + head -n 1 pushes | + git pack-objects --delta-base-offset --revs staging/pack + ) && + test_export base_pack && # and then incrementals between each pair of commits last= &&@@ -87,6 +90,15 @@ do --reflog --indexed-objects --delta-base-offset \ --stdout </dev/null >/dev/null ' + + test_perf "repack with keep ($nr_packs)" ' + git pack-objects --keep-true-parents \ + --honor-pack-keep --assume-kept-packs-closed \ + --keep-pack=pack-$base_pack.pack \ + --non-empty --all \ + --reflog --indexed-objects --delta-base-offset \ + --stdout </dev/null >/dev/null + ' done # Measure pack loading with 10,000 packs.