Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ls-refs: traverse prefixes of disjoint "ref-prefix" sets

Taylor Blau [off-list ref] writes:

Here is a reroll of the series I sent yesterday to traverse the
longest-common prefixes of disjoint sets containing the ref-prefix
arguments to ls-refs.

Not much has changed last time, except some clarification about what
'for_each_fullref_in_prefixes()' can yield, and splitting out the last
patch into one from Jacob and one from me. I've forged his sign-off
since it contains his original code, but it includes a new patch
description from me.

Oh boy I feel behind, but finally I had managed to block time to
read through the two iterations of discussion on this topic without
leaving my desk once, and it was a pleasant read.

Thank you to all three of you.