On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:23:36PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote:
quoted
Having now looked carefully at the ls-refs code, it's a pure
prefix-match, too. So I think we _could_ rely on for_each_fullref_in()
returning us the correct full results, and not checking it further in
send_ref(). But I kind of like keeping it there as an extra check (and
one which could in theory grow more logic later).
Hmm. What if the caller asks for:
ref-prefix refs/tags/a
ref-prefix refs/tags/b
?
The LCP between those two is refs/tags, so send_ref() will presumably
get lots of reuslts that it doesn't care about (assuming there are tags
besides a and b).
Oh, you're right, of course. Ignore me. :)
-Peff