Thread (58 messages) 58 messages, 3 authors, 2019-12-20

Re: [PATCH 04/15] t0003: use named parameters in attr_check()

From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-17 18:43:17

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:01 AM Denton Liu [off-list ref] wrote:
We had named the parameters in attr_check() but $2 was being used
instead of $expect. Make all variable accesses in attr_check() use named
variables instead of numbered arguments for clarity.

While we're at it, add variable assignments to the &&-chain. These
aren't ever expected to fail but for stylistic purposes, include them
anyway for stylistic purposes.
As a justification, "stylistic purposes" isn't very strong. However, a
solid justification is that keeping the &&-chain intact even for these
assignments means that if someone comes along in the future and
inserts code _above_ the assignments, and if that code could fail in
some way, then the intact &&-chain will ensure that that failure is
noticed rather than going unnoticed.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <redacted>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help