There are some commands that have to be skipped from rearranging by virtue
of not handling any commits.

However, the logic was not quite obvious: it skipped commands based on
their position in the enum todo_command.

Instead, let's make it explicit that we skip all commands that do not
handle any commit. With one exception: the `drop` command, because it,
well, drops the commit and is therefore not eligible to rearranging.

Note: this is a bit academic at the moment because the only time we call
`rearrange_squash()` is directly after generating the todo list, when we
have nothing but `pick` commands anyway.

However, the upcoming `merge` command *will* want to be handled by that
function, and it *can* handle commits.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
---
 sequencer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 5aa3dc3c95c..cfa01d3bdd2 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c

@@ -3412,7 +3412,7 @@ int rearrange_squash(void)
 		struct subject2item_entry *entry;
 
 		next[i] = tail[i] = -1;
-		if (item->command >= TODO_EXEC) {
+		if (!item->commit || item->command == TODO_DROP) {
 			subjects[i] = NULL;
 			continue;
 		}

-- 
2.16.1.windows.4