Thread (60 messages) flat view 60 messages, 6 authors, 2017-08-17

Re: [PATCH 4/5] interpret-trailers: add an option to normalize output

From: Christian Couder <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-10 19:39:26

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:00AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The point of "--only-trailers" is to give a caller an output
that's easy for them to parse. Getting rid of the
non-trailer material helps, but we still may see more
complicated syntax like whitespace continuation. Let's add
an option to normalize the output into one "key: value" line
per trailer.

As a bonus, this could be used even without --only-trailers
to clean up unusual formatting in the incoming data.
This is useful for the parsing part, but for the writing part we'd
rather want to have the opposite thing, such as
'--line-break=rfc822'. But this doesn't have to be part of this
series. With this in mind, I do not quite understand the latter
use case how you would use normalized trailers without
--only-trailers?
If you prefer the normalized form (and the input was line-broken in a
way that you don't like), then this would convert to your preferred
form. I agree that you could potentially want the opposite (folding long
lines). Perhaps something like --wrap=72.
Related to this, I wonder if people might want to "normalize" in
different ways later. If that happens, we might regret having called
this option "--normalize" instead of "--one-per-line" for example.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help