Re: [PATCH v5 24/24] t1406: new tests for submodule ref store

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] wrote:

By trial and error, I found that the test succeeds if I comment out the
"for_each_reflog()" test. By having that test write its results to
`/tmp` where they won't be deleted, I found that the problem is that the
`actual` results are not sorted correctly:

    refs/heads/new-master 0x0
    refs/heads/master 0x0
    HEAD 0x1

I don't know why it's so Heisenbergish.

It happens consistently on my other laptop. And yes it looks like
sorting order problem, probably because of the underlying file system.
I did wonder about that at some point but never asked. We do not
guarantee any sorting order in the for-each api, do we?
-- 
Duy