[PATCH v6 06/12] doc: revisions: single vs multi-parent notation comparison
From: Philip Oakley <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-12 23:45:47
Subsystem:
documentation, the rest · Maintainers:
Jonathan Corbet, Linus Torvalds
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-08-26 · Re: [PATCH v6 06/12] doc: revisions: single vs multi-parent notation comparison · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <redacted> --- v6 updated Junio's final comment https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqwpkq6b4d.fsf%40gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/ Cc: Marc Branchaud <redacted> --- Documentation/revisions.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/revisions.txt b/Documentation/revisions.txt
index 17fc45c..242123b 100644
--- a/Documentation/revisions.txt
+++ b/Documentation/revisions.txt@@ -284,6 +284,10 @@ The 'r1{caret}@' notation means all parents of 'r1'. The 'r1{caret}!' notation includes commit 'r1' but excludes all of its parents. By itself, this notation denotes the single commit 'r1'. +While '<rev>{caret}<n>' was about specifying a single commit parent, these +two notations consider all its parents. For example you can say +'HEAD{caret}2{caret}@', however you cannot say 'HEAD{caret}@{caret}2'. + Revision Range Summary ----------------------
--
2.9.0.windows.1