Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] doc: revisions: extra clarification of <rev>^! notation effects
From: Philip Oakley <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-12 22:17:42
From: "Marc Branchaud" <redacted>
On 2016-08-12 03:07 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <redacted> --- new Cc: Jakub Narębski <redacted> https://public-inbox.org/git/578E4F4A.2020708%40gmail.com/ --- Documentation/revisions.txt | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/revisions.txt b/Documentation/revisions.txt index 3da0083..0b5044d 100644 --- a/Documentation/revisions.txt +++ b/Documentation/revisions.txt@@ -281,7 +281,8 @@ for naming a set that is formed by a commit and itsparent commits. The 'r1{caret}@' notation means all parents of 'r1'. -'r1{caret}!' includes commit 'r1' but excludes all of its parents. +'r1{caret}!' notation includes commit 'r1' but excludes all of its parents.This sentence should start with "The".
Accepted. I'd simply split the the previous text, so the nice run-on effect it initially had has been lost.
quoted
+This is the single commit 'r1', if standalone.That reads awkwardly to me. Perhaps By itself, this notation denotes the single commit 'r1'.
Like it. I'd toyed wth quite a few variants. It's jsut a case of finding the nicest one;-)
? M. --
Philip