Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
CHANGES IN OUTPUT: Before, if ref in refs/tags was tag pointing to
commit we used committer epoch as epoch for ref, and used tagger epoch
as epoch only for tag pointing to object of other type. If ref in
refs/tags was commit, we used committer epoch as epoch for ref (see
parse_ref; we sorted in gitweb by 'epoch' field).
I think that behaviour was inconsistent and just silly. Using
creatordate consistently is better so if the code generates what
the commit log claims to, I think that is fine (I haven't looked
at it deeply yet).
Well, I _could_ argue on the former behaviour, namely that we use
committerdate when available (when ref points to commit, or to tag
pointing to commit), and if it is not available we use taggerdate
if possible.
The latter is that we use always "creation" date.
--
Jakub Narebski