Re: [PATCH 1/2] for-each-ref: "creator" and "creatordate" fields

Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:

From fa1a32c9a7c8a31b122df7d07f4a8885cbe120d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:33:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] for-each-ref: "creator" and "creatordate" fields

This adds "creator" (which is parallel to "tagger" or "committer")
and "creatordate" (corresponds to "taggerdate" and
"committerdate").

The first line should not be in the message.  I agree that it is
sensible not to call this "epoch", and "creator" is fine by me.

Thanks.  Will apply.