Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] Unit tests for V2 porcelain status
From: Jakub Narębski <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-20 15:31:00
W dniu 2016-07-20 o 00:10, Jeff Hostetler pisze:
+test_expect_success pre_initial_commit_0 ' + printf "## branch: (initial) master\n" >expected && + printf "?? actual\n" >>expected && + printf "?? dir1/\n" >>expected && + printf "?? expected\n" >>expected && + printf "?? file_x\n" >>expected && + printf "?? file_y\n" >>expected && + printf "?? file_z\n" >>expected &&
Why not use heredoc syntax (cat <<\EOF), or prepare a file with expected output in the testsuite? -- Jakub Narębski