On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:01 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, David Turner wrote:
quoted
unmap:
+ istate->mmap = NULL;
munmap(mmap, mmap_size);
die("index file corrupt");
}
[...]@@ -1698,6 +1705,10 @@ int discard_index(struct index_state
*istate)
free(istate->cache);
istate->cache = NULL;
istate->cache_alloc = 0;
+ if (istate->keep_mmap && istate->mmap) {
+ munmap(istate->mmap, istate->mmap_size);
+ istate->mmap = NULL;
+ }
discard_split_index(istate);
Just curious: any reason why the first hunk munmap()s after resetting
the
field to NULL and the second hunk does it in the opposite order?
No idea. Will change the first hunk.