Thread (35 messages) flat view 35 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-16

Re: [PATCH v5 09/15] index-helper: use watchman to avoid refreshing index with lstat()

From: David Turner <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:18:52

On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 07:15 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Continuing my comment from the --use-watchman patch about watchman
not
being supported...

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:28 AM, David Turner <
dturner@twopensource.com> wrote:
quoted
+static int poke_and_wait_for_reply(int fd)
+{
+       struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
+       struct strbuf reply = STRBUF_INIT;
+       int ret = -1;
+       fd_set fds;
+       struct timeval timeout;
+
+       timeout.tv_usec = 0;
+       timeout.tv_sec = 1;
+
+       if (fd < 0)
+               return -1;
+
+       strbuf_addf(&buf, "poke %d", getpid());
+       if (write_in_full(fd, buf.buf, buf.len + 1) != buf.len + 1)
+               goto done_poke;
+
+       /* Now wait for a reply */
+       FD_ZERO(&fds);
+       FD_SET(fd, &fds);
+       if (select(fd + 1, &fds, NULL, NULL, &timeout) == 0)
+               /* No reply, giving up */
+               goto done_poke;
+
+       if (strbuf_getwholeline_fd(&reply, fd, 0))
+               goto done_poke;
+
+       if (!starts_with(reply.buf, "OK"))
+               goto done_poke;
... while we could simply check USE_WATCHMAN macro and reject in
update-index, a better solution is sending "poke %d watchman" and
returning "OK watchman" (vs "OK") when watchman is supported and
active. If the user already requests watchman and index-helper
returns
just "OK" then we can warn the user the reason of possible
performance
degradation. It's related to the error reporting, but I don't think
you can send straight errors over unix socket. It's possible but it's
a bit more complicated.
Do you mean that we should do this here?  Or in update-index -
-watchman?  If the former, I agree.  If the latter, I'm not sure; maybe
you'll be setting up your index before you've started the index helper?
quoted
+static void refresh_by_watchman(struct index_state *istate)
+{
+       void *shm = NULL;
+       int length;
+       int i;
+       struct stat st;
+       int fd = -1;
+       const char *path = git_path("shm-watchman-%s-%"PRIuMAX,
+                                   sha1_to_hex(istate->sha1),
+                                   (uintmax_t)getpid());
+
+       fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+       if (fd < 0)
+               return;
+
+       /*
+        * This watchman data is just for us -- no need to keep it
+        * around once we've got it open.
+        */
+       unlink(path);
This will not play well when multiple processes read and refresh the
index at the same time. 
Multiple processes will have different pids, right?  And the pid is
included in the filename.  Am I missing something?
This is really extra. But if we know in advance that git does not 
need refresh(), then we should be able to tell index-helper not to 
waste cycles contacting watchman and preparing shm-watchman-%s-%d 
(the poke line gets more parameters). Either that, or we decouple 
watchman requests from read_cache() requests. Only when 
refresh_index() is called that we send something to request shm-
watchman-%s-%d. The same for read_directory() (i.e. untracked cache 
stuff). Hmm?
It's true that we could decouple watchman requests.  I'll look and see
if that's reasonable.
Now that I think of it, with watchman backing us, we probably should
just do nothing in update_index_if_able() (or write_locked_index()
when we know only stat info is changed) when watchman is active. The
purpose of update_index_if_able() is to avoid costly refresh, but we
can already avoid that with watchman. And updating big index files is
always costly (even though it should cost less with split-index). 
That sounds like a change we could make in a separate series.  It's not
a bad idea, but if our goal is to get the basic version out, we should
start there.
Of
course this can only be done if watchman (inotify to be precise) can
cover whole worktree. I'm not sure how watchman behaves when there's
not enough inotify resource to cover full worktree.
It will detect this case and will either manually recrawl (in the event
of a max_queued_events overflow) or return an error (in the event of
too many watched directories).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help