Thread (75 messages) flat view 75 messages, 12 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Lack of netiquette, was Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] New remote-hg helper

From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:12

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Michael J Gruber
[off-list ref] wrote:
[trimmed down heavily by mjg]
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 05.11.2012 16:22:
quoted
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael J Gruber
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 17:09:
quoted
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Michael J Gruber
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
There is no lack of openness from my part. I hear all technical
arguments, and I reply on a technical basis. The problem seems to be
is that you expect the code submitted to be criticized, but not the
criticism it receives. IOW; the submitter has to put up with anything
anybody says about his/her code and ideas, but the *reviewer* is
untouchable; the submitter cannot ever criticize the reviewer. I can
Feel free to criticize the criticism, just don't offend the criticizer
(be it the reviewer or the submitter).
As I've said before; I've yet to see where exactly I have done so.
quoted
quoted
And no, using the same or similar language does not make us the same at
all. Using the same language is the natural prerequisite for successful
communication.
Nobody said otherwise.
Well, you did in the post I responded to:
quoted
quoted
quoted
The dangers of "everyone" following the same style of communication,
and making "everyone" feel comfortable, is that "everyone" ends up
being the same kind of people
Style of communication != language.

You can use the same language and have vastly different styles of communication.

Imagine a society where everyone has the same style of communication.
Where your free speech ends the moment you diverge from this style.
Well, historically we know these societies have not worked, because
there's people with different styles of communication, and quite often
it's these styles of communication that are needed for certain
messages important to society to be heard.

Sure, it doesn't make you all the same, but it certainly makes it a
narrow spectrum.
In any case, I feel I've showed enough efforts and there's no point in
dragging this on.
How convenient. When I ask you specifically for examples where I have
offended anybody, or been harsh, you feel you have "showed enough
efforts"?

Claims require evidence.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help