Re: [PATCH 1/6] revert: Don't remove the sequencer state on error

Hi Jonathan,

Jonathan Nieder writes:

Why bother,
when the behavior is suppressed altogether later in the series?

Actually, this patch helped me while debugging:  I'd originally
intended for it to go into 'maint'.  Things have changed though- the
'sequencer-stable' is close to hitting 'next', and this series seems
to be close behind*; I'll drop this patch altogether during the
re-roll.

Thanks for making me explain this :)

-- Ram